Court adjourns Falana’s suit against VeryDarkMan to January 2025

The claimant’s counsel, however, prayed the court to adjourn
the case to enable him file administrative processes.

“In this circumstance, my lord, the best thing to do is to
adjourn the matter so that we can go back to the registry to file all the
administrative processes,” Banire said.

In his response, counsel to VeryDarkMan, Mr Marvin Omorogbe,
said it had been observed that there was no valid writ of summon before the
court.

He, therefore, prayed the court to strike out the lawsuit.

Omorogbe said he did not know how the registry of the court
would prepare any administrative process.

He opined that the writ already filed was invalid as it was
not before the court.

According to him, the writ bears the same suit number as the
preemptive remedy proceedings.

He said, “Preemptive remedy proceedings ends after
injunction is granted or refused.

“They have gone ahead to file a writ, using the same suit
number as the preemptive remedy proceedings.

“And the court said no, that a fresh writ of summons with a
new suit number, needs to be filed.

“At this point my lord, we will be seeking for a date to
hear our preliminary objection”.

Omorogbe further urged the court to withdraw a motion dated
Oct. 18.

He said the motion was a move to appeal on the ground that
the claimants had admitted, there was an issue in respect to the preemptive
proceedings.

Justice Dawodu, however, struck out the motion, following no
objections from the claimants counsel.

“I will give you a date for hearing because we are talking
about a writ that is not before the court,” Dawodu said.

The judge thereafter adjourned the case until Jan.23, 2025
for hearing of the preliminary objections.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the court also
adjourned the sister case involving Falz and VDM on the same ground.

The court had on Oct. 14 ordered VeryDarkMan to bring down
the alleged defamatory video which he made on Sept. 24 against the Falanas.

The court had made the order following an ex parte
originating application filed by Falana and his son against the actions of
VeryDarkMan.

The court had ordered VeryDarkMan to bring down an
unverified audio recording of a one sided narrative by a cross dresser,
Bobrisky, alleging perversion of justice by Falana and son.